AI your general counsel will sign off on
Evigauge
Legal · Use case
Legal AI is useful the moment its citations can be checked. Evigauge grades every claim against the authority behind it.
Legal
Legal AI pays for itself when the checking stops being manual. That is what provenance and grounding are for.
The situation
Contract review, clause extraction, discovery triage and research memos — high volume, expensive per hour, which is why AI reached it early.
It is also where being confidently wrong costs most. A fabricated citation in a filing is a conduct problem, and the firm carries it.
Where the value leaks
Three costs land before anyone files a ticket. None of them shows up as a failure, which is exactly why they persist.
| Cost | Where it goes |
|---|---|
| TIME | Every output is re-checked by hand If a reviewer cannot see the authority behind a clause, they re-read the source anyway. Drafting time is given back in checking. |
| COST | Senior time spent on assurance Checking falls to the people whose hours cost most, because only they can judge whether a citation holds. |
| RISK | Nothing to show a regulator When a matter is questioned you must show how the answer was reached. A chat transcript is not that record. |
One answer, beat by beat
A single run, with the record Evigauge writes at each step and what that record is worth once it exists.
- 01
Question in· Matter and boundary set
Privileged work is scoped before a single token is sent.
- 02
Authorities retrieved· Cited, dropped, never seen
The authority a clause rests on is visible, so nobody re-reads the contract.
- 03
Clause drafted· Reasoning path
How the position was reached is on the record, not in someone’s memory.
- 04
Citations checked· Per-claim verdict
Fabricated authority is caught here, not in a filing.
- 05
Answer out· Sealed audit record
A challenged matter is answered from evidence that already exists.
What we bring to it
Each capability, what it does to the run, and the result the business can hold someone to.
| Offering | What it does | What you get |
|---|---|---|
| Provenance | Reconstructs every source the answer used, dropped, or never retrieved, scored for authority and recency. | A reviewer opens the sourcing for a clause instead of re-reading the contract. |
| Grounding | Grades each claim against the source cited for it, and flags citations that do not resolve or do not support the sentence. | Fabricated authority is caught before it reaches a filing. |
| Governance & security | Enforces a per-matter trust boundary, redacts privileged content before storage, and writes an append-only audit log. | Privileged matter stays inside your walls, with the record to prove it. |
What actually changes
Reviewer re-reads the source to trust the output
Reviewer opens the sourcing and confirms in seconds
A questioned matter means reconstructing what happened
The record already exists, sealed and timestamped
Privilege risk blocks AI on the work that matters
Closed-boundary deployment, zero egress, logged
Around the table
The question each officer is asked, and the answer this puts in their hands.
General Counsel
“Can we defend this if it is challenged?”
Every claim carries the authority it rests on, in an audit log that cannot be edited.
Chief Risk Officer
“What is our exposure here?”
Unsupported claims are flagged before they ship, not discovered afterwards.
Head of Legal Ops
“Is this actually saving us hours?”
Review time drops because assurance stops being a manual re-read.
Legal AI pays for itself when the checking stops being manual. That is what provenance and grounding are for.
Ready to see it on your own workload?
Bring one real run. We will show you what happened.